At one level, I think this is circular reasoning. "LLMs display burfle because foofle is evidence of Burfle therefore burfle" -except the linkage of foofle to burfle, and belief in burfle is highly conjectural.
At another level, they're working for him and he makes connections and so without citicism implied, solipsism exists: he thinks, therefore he is, LLM and all. In the Jonathan-LLM nexus, he sees recognition of himself. The foofle is burfle.
