This is a variant of the Monty Hall problem, and the trick that makes it unintuitive is that you’ve snuck in the conditional of assuming you have already won.
If you have a ticket and haven’t checked that it is winning, you should expect two winners, regardless of whether you end up being one of them.
If you play the lottery trillions of times (always with the same odds, for simplicity) and build up a frequentist sample of winning events, you will on average be part of a pool of two winners in those instances where you win.
You snuck in the assumption that the first ticket checked (yours) is a winner, which screws up the statistics.
If you have a ticket and haven’t checked that it is winning, you should expect two winners, regardless of whether you end up being one of them.
If you play the lottery trillions of times (always with the same odds, for simplicity) and build up a frequentist sample of winning events, you will on average be part of a pool of two winners in those instances where you win.
You snuck in the assumption that the first ticket checked (yours) is a winner, which screws up the statistics.