All personal property should have adequate protections from seizures. We shouldn't be side stepping protections by moving things to the civil system to avoid the protections in the criminal system. It shouldn't be easier to side step the protections guaranteed as rights just because something seems scary. You've admitted it's fine to strip innocent people of their rights to protect society, and the numbers show that most red flag laws have not been successful and overwhelmingly impact people who pose no threat.
If believing in basic protections and rights is too narrow a view, I'm happy to say that I support that narrow view.
If believing in basic protections and rights is too narrow a view, I'm happy to say that I support that narrow view.