I know it might sound a bit cheesy, but I believe it's uncensored enough to call it that. Try asking DALL·E to create an image of world politicians crashing planes into buildings (not sure why anyone would want that).
My decision to promote the uncensored nature of Flux was based on the fact that it's gaining traction on X and Reddit, where the user base often has specific political leanings.
I feel really silly for asking, but could you clarify which spelling mistake you're referring to? (I'm not denying there might be one.) Neither ChatGPT nor I could find one.
Regarding the language I chose, I completely understand your point, and it might be worth exploring other alternatives. However, I currently have 250 active visitors (who joined within the last 30 minutes), and it seems like the formulation might be going over their heads.
Initially, I was planning on releasing it without any text at all, with just one input.
nah, now i think about it after another comment here, it might really be an unnecessary nitpicking of mine. shit happens here and there, and it's not every time in our power to catch the errors.
still, the thing about twitter/reddit userbase is kinda baffling, i.e. are they even a solid reason for including a remark on 'wokeism', just because of the respective communities' fuss? IMO still better to tie this one to your service's uncensored-ness, in whatever sense of noncommittal to "mainstream liberal media's" consensus or whatnot you choose (if only you still insist on using political slang at all, of course, which i personally suggest to be dropped for any area of the left-right axis or planar compass, while we're speaking about a non-targeted and universal image creation platform.)
And thinking now.. are people who dictate others to obey to proper writing are they authoritarian? Not in the sense of authority, but in the sense of follower and obeyer? :)
"non-woke"