>> confirmed minerals that only form in microgravity environments.
So? That doesn't mean they landed on the roof from space. The really tiny stuff can be blown around. It may land on the ground at point A and then be blown onto a roof miles away at point B. This is why we should not use the simple math of a roof's size to determine the rate of material falling from space.
Hmmm, so you say if a particle reaches a spot not in straight and shortest line from space then it does not count as a particle originated in space fallen on that spot? Could we have a wiggle room still? Like allowing trade winds carry it some limited km laterally, or such?
They originate in space but do not necessarily come directly from space. Stuff is landing on earth all the time. Much of it then becomes dust/sand and gets moved around. What appears on a roof can be new falls from space, but also space stuff blown from elsewhere. Take a an amount of topsoil or sand. Run a magnet over it and you will find tiny flecks of space rock.
I think finding such stuff is regarded by the author as cool. I don't remember the author saying so, but personally I would think finding it is cool whether it first landed on my neighbor's tree, or went straight to my roof.
A significant amount of carbon-14 was added to the atmosphere from nuclear weapons testing. Since it has a half-life of about 5,000 years, most of it is still around. (The rest of it comes from cosmic rays smashing into atmospheric nitrogen.)
Granted, that's an isotope of a well-known element, not one of the "extra elements tacked to the end of the periodic table". I can point out that [tiny traces of plutonium-244 have been found in the ocean seafloor](https://www.npr.org/2021/05/13/996499035/freshly-made-pluton...). That has a half-life of about 80 million years; it's probably the result of ejecta from a supernova washing over the Earth several million years ago.
So? That doesn't mean they landed on the roof from space. The really tiny stuff can be blown around. It may land on the ground at point A and then be blown onto a roof miles away at point B. This is why we should not use the simple math of a roof's size to determine the rate of material falling from space.