Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That's not a guarantee. On some systems memory protection can be sub-page (not sure about x86).

But it sounds like the masking feature mentioned in a sibling comment takes care of it anyway.



Masking is nice, but not available everywhere (i.e. intel is still making new generations of CPUs without AVX-512, and apple silicon doesn't have any masked loads/stores either).

It might not be the nicest thing to assume to be the case on all hardware, but it shouldn't be too unreasonable to put it under an "if (arch_has_a_minimum_page_size)". So many things already assume at least 4KB pages, Intel/AMD aren't gonna break like half the world. If anything, they'd want to make larger pages to make larger L1 caches more feasible.


There's a debate on how unsafe/unsound this technique actually is. https://github.com/ogxd/gxhash/issues/82

I definitely see the conundrum since the dangerous code is such a huge performance gain.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: