Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

This seems like a dead-end purchase.

I like both companies, but there is strongly negative synergy. I'm sure there's some vision behind it, but like most such purchases, one side or both will likely crash-and-burn. That would be sad.

Aside from technology issues, the companies have a completely different culture and ethos. Universally, that's not preserved in acquisitions like these. Gitlab has a very unique culture of transparency, remote work, etc. which won't mesh at all with Datadog.

If the goal is some kind of integration, a much better model is a significant investment and partnership agreement. It's possible to have those permanently binding, while still being attached at the hip.




Well, one thing they have in common: both are insanely expensive.


There's no transparency since they were going IPO. Being transparent is just a storytelling


Yeah I don't see how gitlab fits nicely into Datadog's business.

Maybe they just want some foothold in developer tooling (similar to Microsoft's moves with GitHub and NPM)?


If they become part of Datadog, that kills the likelihood of doing business with anyone who as had a bad experience with DD (I'm in that camp)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: