> should raise taxes, especially for large coorparations and in higher income brackets
Google and Microsoft are large corporations. Their employees and investors are high income. OP proposes curtailing their growth. That reduces those taxes. That’s why OP’s suggestion is a false economy.
Energy, in this context, isn’t a zero sum game. Tax Google and Microsoft more and use that to pay for more power.
By what? We could easily sustain higher production rates for solar, wind and nuclear. The constraints are mainly bureaucratic.
> prefer that those nuclear plans and renewable farms are used for better purposes as hospitals, industries, homes
How do you aim to pay for them?