Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's gotta be an exceptionally awesome video to beat written text though. I'll take mediocre text over good video any day.


This particular video is an exceptionally awesome video.

And so are his other neural net videos.

He keeps bringing you back to first principles, again and again, does not let a single doubt remain, and the code is very accessible and practical.

The intersection between those who can teach and those who truly understand the deepest essence of a subject is much smaller than we would hope. People like Feynman, Tanenbaum, Sussman, Susskind, and now Karpathy are exceedingly rare. Each of them is a gift for generations to come. So, when you find one whose style resonates with the way you think, I suggest watching their videos multiple times. :)


Convert video to text with this one simply secret trick:

* yt-dlp

* whisper

(whisper is surprisingly good for a lot of educational videos)

Even better is to connect text to images. but that's less of a simple trick (although I do have the code).


Thats cool but not exactly the same as reading text that was written to be consumed as text. I think a big part of the reason technical text is easier to digest is the way it's written, and not so much the medium.


How can a video be better than text based info when we're talking about a programming task, which is all text?


Because the value isn't in just having raw reference material like complex code you just paste into your program. The value is in communicating ideas and understanding.

You don't need to skim through the 4 hour video long to see it's full of whys and hows and explanations and demonstrations that massively dwarf the blog post. It's basically a mini course.

Programming is an interactive process, so transcribing the video to text also removes a lot information. The video isn't just an audio form of what could've been a long text tutorial. You're watching someone do something.


> The value is in communicating ideas and understanding.

And those ideas absolutely can't be communicated in concise writing, I have to waste my life on listening to talking heads?


This is an option for those who want to learn from a more interactive medium instead of from a textbook.

Different people learn in different ways. I wouldn’t call any of it a waste.


Yes. Skim the video. You're watching someone explain things interactively in a way that cannot be done with text.

Whether you have the preference for it or not is not up for debate here.


> Skim the video.

So not all 4 hours are worth watching? :)


You can listen someone thought process, that is extremely valuable




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: