Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

[flagged]



I don't think Lego company will have to bear cost of these theft. It will be the retailer.


Really? What about the retailer who didn't pay "cents" to purchase the inventory?


I can't comment on what the earlier comment exactly meant but hopefully the shop has insurance. I'm not condoning the theft.


Retail theft insurance isn't a magic bullet for eliminating losses.

If your store experiences $X in annual theft losses, insurance premiums will likely exceed $X. Insurers need to cover their costs and make a profit.

Insurance doesn't prevent theft; it shifts the financial burden. The economic impact still exists.

Insurance is most effective for low-probability, high-severity events rather than frequent, smaller losses like shoplifting.

Some shops in San Francisco have stopped buying insurance against break-ins, due to the increase in frequency.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: