> Last July, the journal retracted 81 papers from another special issue,
And they learned nothing in the year since, except to try far fewer articles.
Why have "guest-edited issues" if as a rule they are going to undermine the work of their guests?
Obviously they need a period of co-editing before they are willing to trust guest editors.
And they learned nothing in the year since, except to try far fewer articles. Why have "guest-edited issues" if as a rule they are going to undermine the work of their guests?
Obviously they need a period of co-editing before they are willing to trust guest editors.