TLDR: Federalist Society member writes nonsensical opinion piece ignoring U.S. history to try and justify the nonsensical logic underpinning the Loper decision.
This would be like having a pharma executive claiming that they need to charge so much money for medicine so that pharma companies can justify paying the executives huge bonuses.
This would be like having a pharma executive claiming that they need to charge so much money for medicine so that pharma companies can justify paying the executives huge bonuses.