Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It's a scale difference. If you're making bread product for a million people you have a massive factory.. And nuts be there



Of course, everything weird and whacky about the US can be explained because it’s just so much bigger - you wouldn’t understand coming from such a tiny country.


The psychology of this comment aside, I don't think any country is so small it can't fit a massive factory in it. Unless you're writing from Vatican City, perhaps?


My point was that all countries have big factories but in the US they are somehow unable to make sure no cross contamination occurs.

It’s just impossible because US scale /s


The EU allows cross contamination with the same "may contain" labeling as the US previously did.


Are you saying all other countries have zero cross contamination? Can you cite that?


It's possible for the US to take note of it because of scale. Doesn't mean it doesn't happen elsewhere.


This exact issue happens in all of the EU as well...


If the regulations had teeth and they weren't allowed to cross contaminate at all, they would build a process that achieves that. Instead they get to put a few labels on there and just accept that they'll lose some customers who are allergic, save some money not building a new process.


you have misunderstood the situation and are suggesting that they enact the regulation that they did actually enact, which is the one that led to this situation


No I didn't, I understand what they have done to skirt the regulations but that is what I mean. It's so easy to get around the regulations, even the new one, they have no teeth. It's clear the companies are acting in bad faith but there is no recourse.

If it weren't for companies acting in bad faith, they wouldn't have to play regulator cat and mouse. If you removed the regulations altogether, your big bakers would be even more lax with allergens and people would get sick.


So what regulation do you want? One that outlaws sesame bread? No thanks.

As long as making sesame bread is allowed while making bread without sesame is prohibitively expensive (because you need to ensure there are not even trace amounts present) it's obvious what most companies will choose.


You aren’t following what is hsppening. The regulation does exactly that, not allow any cross contamination. So they are adding sesame as an ingredient and labeling it as such.


I did understand that. The regulations have no teeth not because they lack penalties, it's because they are ineffectual atat achieving the goal.

It is clear what the outcome of the regulations was supposed to be, products with sesame and products without. But they were poorly planned regulations, and the companies are more than happy to work to the letter of the law.

But maybe this is actually fine, because a company willing to cleanly process allergen free product can capture that market segment.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: