He is a bit more nuanced than that, I've been reading the blog for quite some time.
He has pointed out areas where MOND falls short in other posts, but it is true that he thinks that LCDM has some serious flaws, and that MOND like theories have a better predictive record.
It's just that from a more complete point-of-view, there are many other areas than rotation curves that depend on dark matter and has been modelled to really require the specific properties of DM that the lambda-CDM model has, and it's just a bit worrisome every time a blog post talks exclusively about rotation curves. Sounds good that he writes about more of the issues elsewhere! The real picture might require a new blend of both DM and MOND of course..
He has pointed out areas where MOND falls short in other posts, but it is true that he thinks that LCDM has some serious flaws, and that MOND like theories have a better predictive record.