We've hit peak consumer/enterprise use with LLMs and not only is the net adoption not only underwhelming they are downright malicious across the board that its not a stretch to suggest the biggest winners from AI bubble are criminals, grifters (shady tech demos aimed at raising $$$ with undeliverables), foreign agents:
- artists/content creators worried
- enterprise/legal worried about implications (legal and production)
- politicians are worried about AI crimes/threats
I feel that we are close to a Minsky moment for this AI space that is currently distorted by capital gains being generated by piggying back off the hype.
Over time, LLMs will run in our browser/phones but with the unchanged perceptions: Its a nifty toy but we need to hire back the people we let go from the initial hype with reduced wages since y'all can generate stuff now
Politicians are concerned because AI has the potential to eradicate middle-class jobs, especially those involving repetitive tasks like data entry. This could create significant socioeconomic issues. Consider how easily AI could replace project managers once integrated with tools like Jira, or how it could automate jobs that involve copying and pasting information between spreadsheets. This level of automation is what many have been anticipating, except for those without marketable skills, who may find themselves at a significant disadvantage.
- artists/content creators worried
- enterprise/legal worried about implications (legal and production)
- politicians are worried about AI crimes/threats
I feel that we are close to a Minsky moment for this AI space that is currently distorted by capital gains being generated by piggying back off the hype.
Over time, LLMs will run in our browser/phones but with the unchanged perceptions: Its a nifty toy but we need to hire back the people we let go from the initial hype with reduced wages since y'all can generate stuff now