That's more or less the definition of AI app for the moment, no? If it's not using an LLM[0] for whatever magic trick it's offering then it's not really an AI app. And if it mediates input/output between the user and the LLM then it's an LLM wrapper.
Every software product is a wrapper of sorts and necessarily masks the some functionality of the ingredients it's made from in order to provide a productive interface.
[0] I know there are other kinds of AI but that's not what people mean when they say AI app now, for better or worse.
I'm pretty clueless about biology, so I'll assume the answer to that is a yes. Not sure what the purpose of the comment is though, it supports my argument that you can't just call something a wrapper of its components without taking into consideration the leap to make it all come together.
Nice reductio ad absurdum. Clearly most SaaS are not wrappers around AWS. Unless you want to say an operating system is a wrapper around the hardware, RAID is a wrapper around disks, etc.
The difference being they add something meaningful which most AI SaaS apps don't (they have a UI that's not any better than the original chatbots and simply have a system prompt that does something -- which the user could easily enter in their own chatbot through custom instructions and whatnot).
Every software product is a wrapper of sorts and necessarily masks the some functionality of the ingredients it's made from in order to provide a productive interface.
[0] I know there are other kinds of AI but that's not what people mean when they say AI app now, for better or worse.