The article mentions that Apple can use OpenAI responses for further training their own models. I don’t want to say that’s impossible but that means they really screwed OpenAI in this deal. OpenAI terms don’t allow training on responses
>But Apple can also collect data on how users utilize GPT-4o versus Apple’s models, and perform gap assessment. This becomes valuable training data for Apple.
I’d read that as: they know what queries users choose to route to OpenAI, so they can identify where their models are being perceived as less capable.
I don’t think the author is revealing non-public knowledge of the contracts.