Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Are you saying GH has more than Codestral and therefore GH has a better model? Or that Codestral would be better because Codestral is not littered with "bad" code?



Bad code is obviously very subjective, but I would wager that GH places a much higher value on feedback mechanisms like stars, issues, PRs, velocity, etc. Their ubiquity likely allows them to automatically cherry-pick less "bad code."


Nothing prevents Mistral do the same if they want to. Issues and and PRs are public information, exposed by APIs, and not that much rate limited.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: