Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The hypothesis is that macrophages transport ink to the lymph nodes during the healing period



The study itself [0] makes a stronger claim:

  When any antigen breaches the skin barrier, the local immunologic response
  includes cell-mediated translocation of the antigen to the local lymph nodes
  from where a systemic immune response is initiated. The translocation of tattoo
  ink seems to be very effective; it has been estimated that 32% of the injected
  pigment is translocated after 6 weeks, and that as much as 99% may become
  translocated over time.

  In clinical settings, pigmented and enlarged lymph nodes have been described in
  tattooed individuals for decades. Translocation of both black and coloured
  tattoo pigments to human lymph nodes has been confirmed, as have depositions of
  metal particles from tattoo needle wear.
That is - it's not just during the healing period, and that it's been confirmed rather than a hypothesis.

[0] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258953702...


Yes, sorry. I meant the hypothesis is that that’s what’s causing the cancer.

Didn’t realize it continued after the healing process as well. That logically means that the earlier you got the tattoo the worse it is.


Is there any proof that after healing there is nothing going on


See sibling reply




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: