Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Maybe. They conspicuously refer to the radiation in what sounds like official language. Expanding the compensation for the harms of WWII-era toxic waste to people in St. Louis, rather than to include the people in St. Louis who were experimented on during the Cold War.

Wild that right after this topic, Burchett pivots the discussion to UFOs and aliens and the US Secretary of Energy asserts that they aren’t real. I guess it could be read as a dismissive suggestion to those interested that the St. Louis experiments are just another conspiracy theory.




They also note that the government has been and will continue to be in charge of decontaminating the affected areas of St. Louis.

This would entail the destruction of physical evidence of what happened.


Well I'm poorly placed to critically review the comparison as I'm a longtime supporter of Rep. Burchett's UAP transparency efforts.


Since you mention by the way, he was followed up shortly after by Rep. Luna's quite competent UAP transparency questioning of DoE Sec. Granholm:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xwx5pLoDXIg&t=5656s




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: