I think I'm growing tired of reading articles and books that disguise opinions as "Best Practice." I find most of these types of articles and guides lacking in substance.
All of them seem to use blanket statements that lack any evidence as to why the claim being made is true. We are just expected to trust the author, when the author isn't even an expert in the topic they are discussing.
Some of these are (hopefully) common knowlwdge to react devs by now.
Although, even though I disagree with some things on that list. They're most certainly not considered good practices, but they're also not the end of the world, really.
The "burns" they'd acquire when applying some of the these tips would lead to great learning opportunities too (without being major setbacks).
Overall, a very decent article for someone starting off with React!
If the list is large or dynamically tendered, then sure mapping over a list makes more sense.
Also, passing in props as object isn't always sensible. Sometimes just spreading them out as individual props makes more sense if they're consumed together (ie to an Address one I'd prefer to use individual props instead of <Address address={address} />).
There's nothing too wrong with components that have many props (I guess same thing that applies to functions with long argument lists applies here too, which is they can be annot to call, but use common sense).
The re-rendering thing shouldn't be a problem. You want thing to re rende if props change (assuming there's not an accidental referential instability causing spurious re-rendering)
There's also less potential performers gotchas with objects vs primitives due to how props get reconciled between rerenders), but this depends a lot on how the objects are created too.
As a rule of thumb, people should prefer primitives, not rich objects that get passed as a single props. The caveat here is that there's exceptions
All of them seem to use blanket statements that lack any evidence as to why the claim being made is true. We are just expected to trust the author, when the author isn't even an expert in the topic they are discussing.