I don't see how this relates. The point was about Palestine as a state. If enough people recognize Palestine as a separate state, this becomes an international issue. I believe this was the A is B claim digging made. What would be the analogous claim for your point? That some folks believe Palestine is it's own state, and some folks don't, and that the views are not mutually exclusive?
Yes, that is my point. The same applies to Taiwan. Guatemala considers Taiwan a country, China does not. Some countries belong to both groups depending on the context.
Yeah, but we are judging a thing that happened in time. So the sets will have some noise/overlap who will specify the conflict as A or B during which time of the conflict.
The ICC likely judges about crimes that happened during multiple phases of the conflict, hence the conflict could have multiple types.
Rather, A is A for many people, and B is B for many people. Both groups aren't mutually exclusive
( GroupA ∩ GroupB ) != ∅