See, you're still taking every opportunity to rant about "control", while continuing to get the technical details wrong (this time: the bit about firmware on a smart NAND chip, which is a real thing but not what the article is about). You're not even bothering to make a cogent case for why retail SSDs should expose this low-level control, just repetitively complaining. You could have actually made the conversation more interesting by taking a different approach.
i could complain about all day about how it's impossible to write a decent driver for ssd here, even hdd drivers seen like decent, which is a far cry, but besides amusing you, where do you think this will go?
