I'm always wary of 100% anything in marketing claims.
In what significant way will these rockets be more reusable than say a Falcon 9, that makes the Falcon 9 not 100% reusable? Put differently, what is a Falcon 9's reusability percentage, and wat difference does it make to bring that number up to 100%?
Quite simple. Stoke space is building a reusable second stage. Falcon 9 does not have a reusable second stage. First stage are like 80% of the structure.
In what significant way will these rockets be more reusable than say a Falcon 9, that makes the Falcon 9 not 100% reusable? Put differently, what is a Falcon 9's reusability percentage, and wat difference does it make to bring that number up to 100%?