Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin
Boeing whistleblower John 'Mitch' Barnett died by suicide, coroner rules (seattletimes.com)
12 points by carabiner on May 17, 2024 | hide | past | favorite | 6 comments


Lets say this is entirely true, but that he was badgered by Boeing and their counsel knowing that this is a likely outcome due to deteriorating mental health that he suffered through their actions, could they be considered accessory to suicide?


Is this the person that committed suicide by self inflicted gunshot to the back of his own head? Or am I mixing up whistleblowers who've committed suicides?


I don't think there's any legitimate reporting about that - I'm pretty sure it was internet hyperbole.

It was with his own gun with a note written in his own handwriting to a person by his own accounts suffered from PTSD.


Why does it matter? Do you think it's impossible to commit suicide in that way? Do you think that the coroner has less information than you do about whether this is suicide or not? Do you think the coroner has less training and knowledge than you do in this area?

Or is it just that conspiracy theories are fun?

For reference, it is rare but not extremely so that people commit suicide with a gunshot to the back of the head. And in fact, you can find studies like https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38471138/ that explicitly go into ways to distinguish between a suicide and a homicide in such situations.


a conspiracy theorist wouldn't accuse the coroner of being poorly trained.

They would say that the coroner was highly pressured, in cahoots, or paid.

conspiracy theories generally don't allow naivety/neglect/negligence/error to be a reasoning for any of the steps; everything is a cog with a purpose.


I don't even think you need a conspiratorial angle here.

Boeing has a lot of whistleblowers. At least 30 active whistleblower cases that I can find, let alone the hundreds of others they have had and closed in previous years.

So on one hand, it makes no sense that Boeing would just target a couple, especially from their non-beleaguered divisions.

And on the other hand, it still does not reflect well on Boeing that they have such a large pool of whistleblowers that coincidences like this could be very likely legitimate.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: