No one is forcing this person to use Google. His article drips with AI phobia. There's no nuance to it. For example, I love LLMs but hate AI music and think it should be banned. AI music solves no problems for us like LLMs are helping us do. AI phobics hate all AI. I'm starting to feel personally attacked by people like this because I am enthusiastic about some AI.
Where? The article drips with annoyance, not fear, at 3 second searches that no longer have the results that were previously returned in fractions of a second.
>There's no nuance to it.
Why does there need to be? Author is annoyed. Author explained annoyance. The end.
>I'm starting to feel personally attacked by people like this
That is a very strong indicator that you should divest yourself from the topic for awhile. The author does not attack you in any way.
>>I'm starting to feel personally attacked by people like this
> That is a very strong indicator that you should divest yourself from the topic for awhile. The author does not attack you in any way.
Before some stray AI evangelist leaps into the comments to promise the tech will get better, I want to be clear that even if it were instantaneous, I still wouldn’t want it. I didn’t ask for results from the plagiarism machine!
That doesn't sound like annoyance to me. It sounds like hate.
Three days ago from my comment history:
-4 points by labrador
Maybe AI will speed up the development process
afavour
Maybe AI will replace eyes
labrador
I'm not going to stop talking about AI just because some hate it
afavour
And I won't stop mocking AI hype just because some believe it
