Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

But a largish slice of the US polity (headed by one of the two credible candidates for President) is dead against …

The point is you have to convince these people. That’s the whole and only ballgame.

Trying to pressure companies into wearing skinsuits via external or internal pressure might be satisfying but it’s a waste of effort.

Convince one company not to work with UAE and another one will gladly take its place. Elect a President that takes human rights into account in foreign policy and now you might get somewhere.

But to do that you have to actually go talk to people that disagree with you. Not just post preaching to the choir posts about how terrible those other guys are.




People (including me) have been trying that for years; but dialog only works if both parties approach it in good faith. When you have a political movement that leans heavily on orthodoxy and loyalty, and whose response to repeatedly losing elections is to simply insist they're rigged and the results are invalid (absent any credible evidence) discussions based on mutually agreeable priors and conventional logic are not fruitful.

The prevailing orthodoxy in this group is that losing elections or court cases is a priori evidence of fraud, violent action to overturn negative outcomes is often permissible, and that this right is reserved for future negative outcomes. They're not willing to be convinced, and loudly advertise their belief that it's OK to impose their point of view on others by force. I mean, if you're dealing with someone who avers that you should be fed into a woodchipper, it's not wise to put one arm in pursuit of a compromise.


So you’re giving up and leaving the country? Because I’m not prepared to do that. I haven’t lost all faith in my countrymen yet.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: