Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It also depends on what tools a developer is already using as a productivity booster.

For example, I use vanilla web components which have some boilerplate for new components.

I already have a simple vscode snippet that does the job well, with no hallucinations [1]. I've experimented with llms doing the same thing with not great results.

It took me longer to explain what I wanted than it did for me to just write that snippet. Doing it repeatedly and waiting for the results definitely didn't increase my speed, though I was impressed that it was eventually able to figure it out (vanilla web components with lit-html renderer isn't a super common technique). Also, I prefer the pythonic approach of snake-case local variable names. Getting the llm to do that in a js project where it's not super common was another whole iteration.

We've had code generation tools around for decades to deal with repetitive boilerplate tasks. Maybe they aren't quite as capable as when the llm "gets it right" - but I wonder with these productivity claims how they are measured.

Are they starting from zero and a new developer? Or comparing against an experienced developer with proficiency with lots of workflow enhancers like templates, snippets, vim macros, etc...

[1] https://gist.github.com/claytongulick/e4251c1b27b22c25fb68f3...



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: