Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Because if there are alternatives, then it isn't a monopoly. Even if we're restricting ourselves to ads, there are other ad networks, and you can find your own sponsors. The OP is a self-admitted lazy commie and just wants to say "Google bad".



> Because if there are alternatives, then it isn't a monopoly.

The definition of monopoly is not 100% market share.


Yeah, it's also not having a high market share.


It seems to me that google has an overpowering presence in the ad market.


> and businesses approaching them

> but it isn't a monopoly!!!11




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: