What exactly is the use case for Coda? It doesn't seem like it offers any benefit for dynamic websites, but then it doesn't have wysiwyg editing either. I am curious why it is popular.
Coda 1 was pretty good when it was released – it raised the bar for approachable HTML and CSS tools, compared to many of the available tools.
Coda 2 actually seems to take a step backwards and it certainly doesn't measure up to the rep that Coda 1 earned out of the gate. It makes some jumps in terms of ancillary UI widgets but it doesn't dramatically change or improve workflows over Coda 1, as far as I can see in 15 minutes of exploring. It doesn't integrate well with dynamic sites or version control from what I can see.
At a minimum, it'd be nice to be able to have a first-class embeded webkit browser as one of the options for the frame/panes but the closest they come is a preview – which works really hard to only render the file you're working on (but does include a small URL field).
The big new feature is MySQL integration? Clearly they had a very specific user persona in mind – and I don't really know who that is... but I think they're from ~5-10 years ago.
I think I'll pass, honestly... sadly. I hope I'm just missing something because this was an update I wanted to see.
I've paid for Sublime Text and it does the job (and is my preferred editor on Linux), but, for me at least, it doesn't "fit" on a Mac as well as Coda. And I can't really tell you why that is.
Coda (1) is a great tool for beginners, if you're just figuring out HTML/CSS/JS/Wordpress/PHP/Terminal/etc. It also works well for those who are not supposed to be too technical – designers, for example.
As you become a more proficient developer, you begin to appreciate the configurability and extensibility of textmate/sublime/emacs/whatever over the polished but limited workflow conventions of Coda. (At least I did, Sublime FTW!)
I've always wondered the same thing. It seems like Panic is getting a pass just for being Panic.
When there's something like Sublime Text 2 out there for $60, I'm surprised people are so attracted to these all-in-one apps that aren't as extendible and typically load files slower.
I just bought Coda 2 thinking it had improved by leaps and bounds. It's just the same thing, more or less. What site actually has urls ending in .php these days? How can you preview pretty URLs? It's just a total waste of money.
