Nightfall is justly famous, and recognised as one of the best short stories ever penned, and very much a pinicle of Asimovs impressive output.
It is interesting partly for being based on a discussion between editor (John W Campbell) and author based on no more than a quote from a poem by Emerson. That's all it takes. A simple quote taken and examined.
It's also interesting for being written when he was only 21. Did he "peak" then? I think not - his legacy stretches far beyond Nightfall, and to my mind his Laws of Robotics have a bigger impact on society, especially now.
But the story is remarkable for being unique, memorable, and self-complete. Yes, he expanded on the idea in 1990, but the story didn't need it, it was perfect as was.
> It is interesting partly for being based on a discussion between editor (John W Campbell) and author based on no more than a quote from a poem by Emerson. That's all it takes. A simple quote taken and examined.
What was the quote?
edit: it is in the linked paper, “If the stars should
appear one night in a thousand years, how would
men believe and adore, and preserve for many
generations the remembrance of the city of God!”
It is interesting partly for being based on a discussion between editor (John W Campbell) and author based on no more than a quote from a poem by Emerson. That's all it takes. A simple quote taken and examined.
It's also interesting for being written when he was only 21. Did he "peak" then? I think not - his legacy stretches far beyond Nightfall, and to my mind his Laws of Robotics have a bigger impact on society, especially now.
But the story is remarkable for being unique, memorable, and self-complete. Yes, he expanded on the idea in 1990, but the story didn't need it, it was perfect as was.
Rest well, Good Doctor.