Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Surprised even MPEG-5 EVC made it. Unfortunately the VVC Decoder didn't quite make it ( Edit : Officially ) . I guess we will have to wait until version 7.1. Still waiting for x266.



The built-in VVC decoder is dreadfully slow (a ton of optimizations are missing), VVdec is at least 2-3 times faster on anything having AVX2/SSE4.

If you really want to give VVC a try, better stay with version 6.1.1 as it's the last one which has patches for enabling VVdec. You won't be able to apply them to version 7.0/git master:

https://github.com/fraunhoferhhi/vvenc/wiki/FFmpeg-Integrati...


VVC decoder is available, but it's flagged as experimental, so you have to prefix `-strict experimental` before the VVC input `-i`.


Thanks Yes I meant officially. Was hoping the we could set stage for VVC little earlier. I know VVC is not popular on HN or literally anywhere on Internet but I do hope to see it moving forward instead of something like MPEG-5 EVC which is somewhat dead in the water.


I don't know that having so many codecs is a good thing unless they really add something. How does it compare to av1 (which I was under the impression is coming to be the natural successor of hevc, with hardware support)?


Comparing to AV1, VVC / H.266 is expected to offer 20-30% reduction in Bit-Rate with similar quality at similar level of computational complexity. And it is already deployed and used in real world in China and India. I believe Brazil are looking to use it as their next generation codec for broadcasting along with LCEVC.




VVC is marked as experimental as fuzzing continues on it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: