voice ID adoption won't work anyways, its not a secure way. consider a person has throat infection, his voice will obviously be deep due to the infection. if we spare that as well, openAI has launched a voice clone AI. Those who are using it now will eventually change it.
> its not a secure way. consider a person has throat infection
Sadly providers' narrow view of "security" fails to recognise that as a lack. It considers it merely an access interruption, workaroundable by fallback to backup methods of authentication, even if that's a costly in-person visit to the bank.
The bigger problem though is the whole idea that something so unsecretable and reproducible as voice should ever be considered for ID.
