Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> I hope you are not on a jury trying a child rapist and blaming the parents as 100% at fault.

I just want to remind everyone else that saying something like this to another human being is an incredibly ugly thing to do, and it is only because the bar for "acceptable discussions" online is so low (that it's underground) that people feel comfortable saying crazy things like this to each other.

Like, I'll be honest, if someone came at me with this "child rapist" line after I said "Liability should be 100% on the parents", that would be my cue to immediately stop interacting with that person. Less reasonable people would throw their drink in your face for saying something like this, some people would even punch you.

Talking to other people like this is not okay, there are better ways to make your point.

(And no, I do not believe "Liability should be 100% on the parents", but I would never accuse someone of letting a predator off the hook just because they have that opinion.)




The idea that liability should be 100% on the parents is an absolute horrific ugly hacker news only type take.

Hackers love to argue these sort of points into the ground. I'm sick of it. They take these points to absurd lengths.

And yes, these arguments overlap with child protection issues. I'm not a "protect the children" political type, but these types of arguments and derivates show up in a fair bit of ugly stuff.

And no - someone like this who does not believe in third party liability with respect to children should not be on a jury.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: