Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Perhaps a likeness of it was used in a way they didn't approve but, still, their face wasn't stolen from them. This isn't the same logic at all.



It seems you're then fine with me "lending" your voice to make irritating prank calls to all your relatives and coworkers - since it's, to reiterate, fair use of AI in your opinion


Why do you think that means I'm lending my voice? I still have the ability to talk while you're playing around with a digital representation of my voice. If I lend you my car, I can't use it to drive myself around because you have it.


Not theft. That's fraud.


ok let me fix the original quote then - it's not protectionism when you're defending something from fraud.


I mean harassment or libel laws already cover this right? Or revenge porn laws could apply if you did it to your ex. That's not fair use, simply reproducing the sound of a voice using AI is not a crime.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: