Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Here is a recent example of consumer harm posted to HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39773736

> I am curious though, why is the iOS version €4.99 but the Android version is free ? I've seen this a lot actually and have always wondered, I figured it might just be Apple's annual developer license fee but not sure.

Apple users are being forced to pay more for equivalent software because of Apple's tax.




Oh 100% I agree. My question/point is about how the US system treats monopolistic practices, and I worry that actually that example works in Apple's favour as they would likely argue that consumers are free to switch to android if they want cheaper apps.


If apple were to pay for the android replacement phone & perform the transfer of personal data to the new device then that might be a valid argument. As it is they do their best to lock users in to prevent them from ever switching.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: