Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The article has this statement:

> The new study reveals a problem that may grow as electric cars become more and more common over the next several decades. Electric cars, Smith explained, are not truly zero-emission vehicles, so municipalities need to think about strategies to reduce emissions from brake use as well as tailpipes.

Which completely ignores regenerative braking.




The first sentence of the abstract also shows a technically correct statement easily used for disingenuous framings:

“The coming decades promise a transition from internal combustion engines to electric, and with it a greater relative contribution of nonexhaust sources to urban air pollution.”


The brake dust argument is something I’ve noticed coming more from the “ban all cars” crowd more than the “anti-EV/pro-ICE” crowd.

I assume the objective is that these people want to see things go from ICE cars to public transportation instead of EVs.


And while setting up cities to go from car-centric cities to something that's walkable and/or easily accessibly by bus/train/bike for the majority of able-bodied people is something I agree with, that's a change that will take decades to roll out. In the meantime, the cars are here to stay, so we might as well push to get cleaner ones.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: