Enjoy this set of pages. Clearly done with love. And shows how the 3:16 method -- "the way of the cross section" -- works. Unfortunate that he had to spoil the joke in the "story of O" page, but I guess it was necessary. Otherwise, the ending is quite enough:
> But a small number of unpatriotic, troublemaking skeptics now suggest that the "World Wide Web" may have contained tiny amounts of false or misleading information and should not be considered completely trustworthy. Some even conjecture that there were satirical or ironic websites, deliberate parodies of the truth. Such cynicism is, in our view, despicable.
Enjoy this set of pages. Clearly done with love. And shows how the 3:16 method -- "the way of the cross section" -- works. Unfortunate that he had to spoil the joke in the "story of O" page, but I guess it was necessary. Otherwise, the ending is quite enough:
> But a small number of unpatriotic, troublemaking skeptics now suggest that the "World Wide Web" may have contained tiny amounts of false or misleading information and should not be considered completely trustworthy. Some even conjecture that there were satirical or ironic websites, deliberate parodies of the truth. Such cynicism is, in our view, despicable.