It's not even that they say it's been ineffective; they're saying that the EC can't prove that it has been effective.
And AFAIK there's also no reasoning given why it's fine to prevent apps from mentioning other payment options, even assuming it's not anti-competitive. (But to be fair, I haven't actually gone to the source to read their statement.)
And AFAIK there's also no reasoning given why it's fine to prevent apps from mentioning other payment options, even assuming it's not anti-competitive. (But to be fair, I haven't actually gone to the source to read their statement.)