It sucked because we didn't have the possibility of distributed version control,... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		tome on Dec 11, 2008 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Why Subversion does not suck It sucked because we didn't have the possibility of distributed version control, even if we really wanted it. Some people and some projects prefer centralized. That's fine. But you can't build a distributed version control system out of a centralized one.

kragen on Dec 11, 2008 [–]

svk? Also BitKeeper was built on SCCS, and ClearCase MultiSite was built on ClearCase.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact