Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It seems that yes, they're saying that 1 and 5 are roughly the same. Basically, why is the matter in the universe ~20% "non-dark", and not 1%, or .001%?



There’s that old joke that computer scientists think any numbers within a power of two are equal, physicists think any numbers within a power of 10 are equal, and mathematicians only distinguish between finite numbers and infinity.

Edit: and engineers are as precise as they are paid to be.


For software engineers, the only numbers are 0, 1, and infinity.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_one_infinity_rule


And cows are spherical!


At some point of its lives. Yes. Is an universal true. Then the zygote starts splitting.


Having proved the contribution of these second and third order terms are between plus 10 and 20% over the range of interest we will multiply by a constant 1.15


between finite numbers and infinities. Plural, please, the discerning mathematician keeps a stable of infinities ;)


"The 80/20 rule"/The Pareto principle

> Mathematically, the 80/20 rule is roughly described by a power law distribution (also known as a Pareto distribution) for a particular set of parameters. Many natural phenomena distribute according to power law statistics. It is an adage of business management that "80% of sales come from 20% of clients." [1][2]

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_principle

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_law


Could you elaborate on how this is related? To me, the 80/20 rule and the 1:5 matter ratio seem like entirely separate concepts that coincidentally share the same ratio.


1:4, no?


Good point, I wasn't thinking and I equated ratios and fractions. That should make the 80/20 rule even less related to the 1:5 matter ratio?


Well 80:20 and 5:1 are pretty similar ratios.

Though really the issue with the comparison is that it implies that 80% (or ~83.3%) of the <something> is correlated to the light matter, and the other 20% (or ~16.7%) of the <something> is correlated to the dark matter. Maybe eventually we'll learn enough about dark matter and discover that, yeah actually, 1/6 of the life, or unobtanium, or whatever, is actually in the dark matter. But for now, I agree that the Pareto principle seems pretty irrelevant.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: