GP is surprised the article doesn't confirm their implicit bias.
and then GP misattributes the surprise to "today's despicable journalism"??
nono. tons of quality journalism is fine. please go and think about your implicit bias.
just to be sure we talk about the same thing
https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/takeatouchtest.html
Why is it bad to assume that a US-centric site is writing a US-centric article when they put "feds" in the title?
Why does there being an implicit bias towards expecting a US-centric site to produce US-centric articles, mean that the journalism is not misleading?
It doesn't. It is misleading. It is clickbait. You are defending the indefensible.
GP is surprised the article doesn't confirm their implicit bias.
and then GP misattributes the surprise to "today's despicable journalism"??
nono. tons of quality journalism is fine. please go and think about your implicit bias.
just to be sure we talk about the same thing
https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/takeatouchtest.html