Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

There’s an ongoing thread on Twitter where Sam takes suggestions from replies and shares the output. E.g. https://x.com/sama/status/1758200420344955288?s=46&t=VQo1eLU...



Just from a quick scan, those are a lot worse than the ones on the marketing page.


Definitely a lot worse, but still an order of magnitude better than every other attempt at generative video.

Even these may be cherry-picked though, he's only posted a few and I'm sure he's gotten thousands of requests already.



Significantly simpler scenery. I'd put only the first at good complexity/quality.

2nd is quite simple, but still suffers from your typical lighting issues that plague image gen. (shadows are significantly off)

3rd has magically appearing spoon and isn't that complex.

4th has a lot of prompt following issues

Some others feel quite off -- wizard, flying dragon, etc.

Still impressive of course, but not to the degree of what I saw on the marketing page.


holy crap. these are still amazing though.

I guess he might be generating 50 for each response and posting the best, but that would seem deliberately disingenuous which hasn't been openai's style.

even the worst is still orders of magnitude better than anything else.


Is there any alternative to Nitter?


I think Nitter may still work if you self-host it, but otherwise no, they have made it impossible to read without an account.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: