>I don't see why certain business terms shouldn't be able to be regulated in the interest of the general public.
Implying that there is a legitimate public interest in equal-cost access to rides at disneyland does not seem like a defensible position.
That's a bit like saying it is against the interest of the public to charge more prime orchestra seats than second tier balcony seats at the opera.
My position is that if Disney wants to charge ten trillion dollars to skip the line to ride a rollecoaster and one cent for a rollercoaster ride with a 40-year waiting period, that's none of my concern.
Implying that there is a legitimate public interest in equal-cost access to rides at disneyland does not seem like a defensible position.
That's a bit like saying it is against the interest of the public to charge more prime orchestra seats than second tier balcony seats at the opera.
My position is that if Disney wants to charge ten trillion dollars to skip the line to ride a rollecoaster and one cent for a rollercoaster ride with a 40-year waiting period, that's none of my concern.