Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Even a supreme court can be wrong sometimes. In the US that's been happening more often of late.



Can you give an example?



Citizens United says that something that’s undeniably speech—a movie about a politician—can’t be suppressed merely because the speakers pay for it through the vehicle of a corporation. What do you think is incorrect about that?

If Citizens United has gone the other way, the Trump administration would have been able, for example, to order Facebook to suppress posts about COVID death tolls near the election.


They call judicial output opinions for a reason.


Morse v. Frederick




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: