Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

There is no quote that says that.

"Earnings per share (“EPS”) in the most recent fiscal year were lower than the EPS generated by Disney a decade ago"

is not the same as "underpeforming for a decade".

all that says is that EPS is currently low, not that it has been low and reducing/stagnant for a decade.




Ok, it's quite possible I just didn't understand the writing. How about this part?

> Disney shareholders were once over $200 billion wealthier than they are now

Is that an exaggeration?


From here:

https://filmthreat.com/news/male-and-pale-is-stale-responses...

  As a result, the money generated by the industry has seen a 
  remarkably noticeable drop. The rise of the term “flop buster”
  (in response to so many films like Indiana Jones and the 
  Dial of Destiny underperforming at the box office) seems to 
  be directly related to mainstream audiences’ wholesale rejection
  of the over-messaging they see hijacking entertainment.
addresses your "it's just nature of Box Office" flopping argument




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: