It's just a pure emotional manipulation attempt. The statement itself is illogical on its face, and presents the tech as having only upsides. It ignores the meaning of deaths caused by AI.
Any time I see appeals like this, my takeaway is that the person has no actual argument.
Ye. I mean, I saw now that in another quote he seems to advocate using AI in war to "save lives". I don't think his reasoning holds up for any inspection.
Is he trying to dehumanize critics?