While this headshot tool demonstrates the nascent capabilities of generative AI, I have some concerns about its privacy/transparency approach. As an alternative, I've been experimenting with kahma.io, which I believe handles subject data and model provenance in a more ethical manner. Rather than closed models trained on unknown datasets, they employ self-supervised learning from generic images and prioritize non-identifiability over photorealism - a principled stance I appreciate, even if the results are less polished. It also seemed their methodology for human-centric output customization was more nuanced than just generating portraits. All that said, I welcome further discussion on balancing technical and ethical considerations as this field progresses.
On Android this is either worth $4.99 / week or $15.99 / week to use, and the 7 day trial attempts to subscribe you to their premium tier automatically at the end of the 7 day trial through play store pre authorisation. Thats some grubby dark pattern crap.
They've popped up on here a few times lately, MO appears to be to buy apps, run them into subscriptions with dark patterns to make it hard to get out of, sack off all the staff and let the scammy money flood in.
Why does it only allow one photo upload? Wouldn't more photos give a better result? For me, the headshot looked nothing like me. Not even the correct race.
The multiple file upload feature has been updated, you can now upload up to 4 images and the generated headshot will be more accurate, thanks for your suggestion.
I hate these ipadapter face generations they just have something uncanny to it especially when used with SD 1.5 models like here ateast do an img2img pass over the results...
