On: Is the Reproducibility Crisis Reproducible?

[maxbond]

Be sure to check the comments at the bottom. The authors of the papers in question respond to these criticisms.

https://www.argmin.net/p/is-the-reproducibility-crisis-repro...

https://www.argmin.net/p/is-the-reproducibility-crisis-repro...

https://www.argmin.net/p/is-the-reproducibility-crisis-repro...

[westhanover → maxbond]

Which are completely ignored by the author of this article. Since the paper was picked up by some right leaning news outlets, unserious people feel the need to step in and start attacking the authors and the paper out of some dogmatic response.

[alexmolas → westhanover]

The next post in the author's blog addresses the comments by the authors of the article [0].

Also, I don't think the arguments written in the post are "unserious", you might not like them but the author of the blog makes some interesting points against the original paper.

[0]: https://www.argmin.net/p/arbitrage-in-data-exchange-rates

[westhanover → alexmolas]

I would not call that addressing the comments, he merely acknowledged them and rehashed his same argument. The follow up was better left unposted.