The article portrays this as a negative, but all I'm seeing is an innovative way to save on sky-high CEO cost. We've always dreamed of operating without and now we have, it seems like exactly the opposite reaction.
Exactly, since when does a CEO in a Hyperverse company need to exist in this universe? It is enough if he/she/it exists in some other timeline and can be leveraged across the Multiverse. Clearly just another attempt to badmouth crypto.
It’s when the Hyperverse crosses into the real-a-verse that a person with a social security number or birth certificate is required. You can’t just make people up. If you operate without a CEO then operate without one. Don’t pretend one exists to get real-a-verse money for your hyperverse. That’s fraud.
Reigning in costs on the CEO doesn’t mean we need to swing to the other side of the spectrum and commit fraud and portray some image as the CEO. Hopefully you are doing a tongue in cheek commentary
